在oracle中可以指定的表连接的hint有很多：ordered hint 指示oracle按照from关键字后的表顺序来进行连接；leading hint 指示查询优化器使用指定的表作为连接的首表，即驱动表；use_nl hint指示查询优化器使用nested loops方式连接指定表和其他行源，并且将强制指定表作为inner表。
在mysql中就有之对应的straight_join,由于mysql只支持nested loops的连接方式，所以这里的straight_join类似oracle中的use_nl hint。mysql优化器在处理多表的关联的时候，很有可能会选择错误的驱动表进行关联，导致了关联次数的增加，从而使得sql语句执行变得非常的缓慢，这个时候需要有经验的DBA进行判断，选择正确的驱动表，这个时候straight_join就起了作用了，下面我们来看一看使用straight_join进行优化的案例：
1．用户实例：spxxxxxx的一条sql执行非常的缓慢，sql如下：
73871 | root | 127.0.0.1:49665 | user_app_test | Query | 500 | Sorting result | SELECT DATE(practicetime) date_time,COUNT(DISTINCT a.userid) people_rows FROM test_log a,USER b WHERE a.userid=b.userid AND b.isfree=0 AND LENGTH(b.username)>4 GROUP BY DATE(practicetime)
2.查看执行计划：
mysql> explain SELECT DATE(practicetime) date_time,COUNT(DISTINCT a.userid) people_rows FROM test_log a,USER b WHERE a.userid=b.userid AND b.isfree=0 AND LENGTH(b.username)>4 GROUP BY DATE(practicetime); mysql> explain SELECT DATE(practicetime) date_time,COUNT(DISTINCT a.userid) people_rows -> FROM test_log a,USER b -> WHERE a.userid=b.userid AND b.isfree=0 AND LENGTH(b.username)>4 -> GROUP BY DATE(practicetime)\G; *************************** 1. row *************************** id: 1 select_type: SIMPLE table: a type: ALL possible_keys: ix_test_log_userid key: NULL key_len: NULL ref: NULL rows: 416782 Extra: Using filesort *************************** 2. row *************************** id: 1 select_type: SIMPLE table: b type: eq_ref possible_keys: PRIMARY key: PRIMARY key_len: 96 ref: user_app_testnew.a.userid rows: 1 Extra: Using where 2 rows in set (0.00 sec)
3.查看索引：
mysql> show index from test_log; +————–+————+————————-+————–+————-+———–+————-+———-++ | Table | Non_unique | Key_name | Seq_in_index | Column_name | Collation | Cardinality | Sub_part | Packed | Null | Index_type | Comment | +————–+————+————————-+————–+————-+———–+————-+———-++ | test_log | 0 | ix_test_log_unique_ | 1 | unitid | A | 20 | NULL | NULL | | BTREE | | | test_log | 0 | ix_test_log_unique_ | 2 | paperid | A | 20 | NULL | NULL | | BTREE | | | test_log | 0 | ix_test_log_unique_ | 3 | qtid | A | 20 | NULL | NULL | | BTREE | | | test_log | 0 | ix_test_log_unique_ | 4 | userid | A | 400670 | NULL | NULL | | BTREE | | | test_log | 0 | ix_test_log_unique_ | 5 | serial | A | 400670 | NULL | NULL | | BTREE | | | test_log | 1 | ix_test_log_unit | 1 | unitid | A | 519 | NULL | NULL | | BTREE | | | test_log | 1 | ix_test_log_unit | 2 | paperid | A | 2023 | NULL | NULL | | BTREE | | | test_log | 1 | ix_test_log_unit | 3 | qtid | A | 16694 | NULL | NULL | | BTREE | | | test_log | 1 | ix_test_log_serial | 1 | serial | A | 133556 | NULL | NULL | | BTREE | | | test_log | 1 | ix_test_log_userid | 1 | userid | A | 5892 | NULL | NULL | | BTREE | | +————–+————+————————-+————–+————-+———–+————-+———-+——–+——+——-+
4.调整索引，A表优化采用覆盖索引：
mysql>alter table test_log drop index ix_test_log_userid,add index ix_test_log_userid(userid,practicetime)
5.查看执行计划：
mysql> explain SELECT DATE(practicetime) date_time,COUNT(DISTINCT a.userid) people_rows FROM test_log a,USER b WHERE a.userid=b.userid AND b.isfree=0 AND LENGTH(b.username)>4 GROUP BY DATE(practicetime)\G *************************** 1. row *************************** id: 1 select_type: SIMPLE table: a type: index possible_keys: ix_test_log_userid key: ix_test_log_userid key_len: 105 ref: NULL rows: 388451 Extra: Using index; Using filesort *************************** 2. row *************************** id: 1 select_type: SIMPLE table: b type: eq_ref possible_keys: PRIMARY key: PRIMARY key_len: 96 ref: user_app_test.a.userid rows: 1 Extra: Using where 2 rows in set (0.00 sec)
调整后执行稍有效果，但是还不明显，还没有找到要害：
SELECT DATE(practicetime) date_time,COUNT(DISTINCT a.userid) people_rows FROM test_log a,USER b WHERE a.userid=b.userid AND b.isfree=0 AND LENGTH(b.username)>4 GROUP BY DATE(practicetime); ………………. 143 rows in set (1 min 12.62 sec)
6.执行时间仍然需要很长，时间的消耗主要耗费在Using filesort中，参与排序的数据量有38W之多，所以需要转换驱动表；尝试采用user表做驱动表：使用straight_join强制连接顺序：
mysql> explain SELECT DATE(practicetime) date_time,COUNT(DISTINCT a.userid) people_rows FROM USER b straight_join test_log a WHERE a.userid=b.userid AND b.isfree=0 AND LENGTH(b.username)>4 GROUP BY DATE(practicetime)\G; *************************** 1. row *************************** id: 1 select_type: SIMPLE table: b type: ALL possible_keys: PRIMARY key: NULL key_len: NULL ref: NULL rows: 42806 Extra: Using where; Using temporary; Using filesort *************************** 2. row *************************** id: 1 select_type: SIMPLE table: a type: ref possible_keys: ix_test_log_userid key: ix_test_log_userid key_len: 96 ref: user_app_test.b.userid rows: 38 Extra: Using index 2 rows in set (0.00 sec)
执行时间已经有了质的变化，降低到了2.56秒；
mysql>SELECT DATE(practicetime) date_time,COUNT(DISTINCT a.userid) people_rows FROM USER b straight_join test_log a WHERE a.userid=b.userid AND b.isfree=0 AND LENGTH(b.username)>4 GROUP BY DATE(practicetime); …….. 143 rows in set (2.56 sec)
7.在分析执行计划的第一步：Using where; Using temporary; Using filesort，user表其实也可以采用覆盖索引来避免using where的出现，所以继续调整索引：
mysql> show index from user; +——-+————+——————+————–+————-+———–+————-+———-+——–+——+————+———+ | Table | Non_unique | Key_name | Seq_in_index | Column_name | Collation | Cardinality | Sub_part | Packed | Null | Index_type | Comment | +——-+————+——————+————–+————-+———–+————-+———-+——–+——+————+———+ | user | 0 | PRIMARY | 1 | userid | A | 43412 | NULL | NULL | | BTREE | | | user | 0 | ix_user_email | 1 | email | A | 43412 | NULL | NULL | | BTREE | | | user | 1 | ix_user_username | 1 | username | A | 202 | NULL | NULL | | BTREE | | +——-+————+——————+————–+————-+———–+————-+———-+——–+——+————+———+ 3 rows in set (0.01 sec) mysql>alter table user drop index ix_user_username,add index ix_user_username(username,isfree); Query OK, 42722 rows affected (0.73 sec) Records: 42722 Duplicates: 0 Warnings: 0 mysql>explain SELECT DATE(practicetime) date_time,COUNT(DISTINCT a.userid) people_rows FROM USER b straight_join test_log a WHERE a.userid=b.userid AND b.isfree=0 AND LENGTH(b.username)>4 GROUP BY DATE(practicetime); *************************** 1. row *************************** id: 1 select_type: SIMPLE table: b type: index possible_keys: PRIMARY key: ix_user_username key_len: 125 ref: NULL rows: 42466 Extra: Using where; Using index; Using temporary; Using filesort *************************** 2. row *************************** id: 1 select_type: SIMPLE table: a type: ref possible_keys: ix_test_log_userid key: ix_test_log_userid key_len: 96 ref: user_app_test.b.userid rows: 38 Extra: Using index 2 rows in set (0.00 sec)
8.执行时间降低到了1.43秒：
mysql>SELECT DATE(practicetime) date_time,COUNT(DISTINCT a.userid) people_rows FROM USER b straight_join test_log a WHERE a.userid=b.userid AND b.isfree=0 AND LENGTH(b.username)>4 GROUP BY DATE(practicetime); 。。。。。。。 143 rows in set (1.43 sec)
